Back to Blog

Context Windows and Retrieval in AI Systems

Youssef El Ramy4 min read

What Context Assembly Is

Before generating a response, an AI system assembles everything it can reference into a single context window.

This window has a fixed size (measured in tokens). Everything inside the window can influence the response. Everything outside does not exist to the model.


The Context Window

Modern LLMs have context windows ranging from 128K to 1M+ tokens.

ModelApproximate Context Window
GPT 5.2200K tokens
Claude 4.5200K tokens (1M in beta)
Gemini 3.01M+ tokens
Llama 4128K tokens

Larger windows allow more information, but attention quality degrades with length.


How Context Gets Filled

For a typical AI assistant query, context assembly includes:

  1. System prompt (instructions, persona)
  2. Conversation history (prior messages)
  3. Retrieved documents (from RAG pipeline)
  4. User query (the current question)

The order matters. Items placed earlier receive more attention weight.


How AI Finds Information to Cite

When you ask ChatGPT or Perplexity a question, it doesn't just guess from memory.

Modern AI systems search for relevant content first, then use what they find to answer you. This process is called Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG).

The simple version:

  1. You ask a question
  2. The system searches a database of content
  3. It pulls the best matches into the AI's working memory
  4. The AI answers based on what it retrieved

Think of it like a research assistant. You ask a question. They search the filing cabinet, pull relevant documents, and answer based on what they found.

The technical version:

  1. Embed the user query into a vector
  2. Search a vector database using similarity metrics
  3. Retrieve top-k matching document chunks
  4. Inject retrieved content into the context window
  5. Generate a response grounded in retrieved context

The critical point remains the same:

If your content isn't indexed, it can't be retrieved. If it's not retrieved, it's not in the context. If it's not in the context, you don't exist.


What Gets Retrieved

Retrieval systems use semantic similarity.

They compare:

  • Query embedding
  • Document chunk embeddings

Top matches (by cosine similarity) are retrieved.

Documents compete for retrieval slots.

If your content's embedding is:

  • Too generic → matches everything weakly
  • Too specific → matches only narrow queries
  • Ambiguous → matches unpredictably

Then you lose to competitors with cleaner signals.


Chunking and Boundaries

Long documents are split into chunks before embedding.

Chunking decisions affect retrieval:

Chunk StrategyEffect
Fixed-size (512 tokens)May split mid-sentence
Sentence-basedPreserves semantic units
Paragraph-basedCaptures local context
Section-basedMaintains document structure

Bad chunking can fragment your claims.

A claim like "Gong serves 4,900+ customers and is SOC 2 certified" might be split across chunks, weakening both.


Why Retrievability Determines Visibility

The retrieval phase is binary for each document:

  • Retrieved → enters context → can influence response
  • Not retrieved → invisible → cannot be cited

There is no partial retrieval. There is no "almost made it."

Retrieval is the gatekeeping layer.


What Makes Content Retrievable

High retrievability:

  • Self-contained claims (don't require external context)
  • Clear entity identification in each chunk
  • Explicit statement of what, who, why
  • Consistent terminology matching likely queries

Low retrievability:

  • Claims spread across multiple sections
  • Entity names only in headers, not body text
  • Assumed context never stated
  • Jargon that doesn't match user vocabulary

Practical Example

Low retrievability:

"Our platform helps you do more with less. With AI-powered insights, teams can work smarter and achieve better outcomes."

This matches almost any productivity query weakly, and no specific query strongly.

High retrievability:

"Gong's revenue intelligence platform records and analyzes B2B sales calls. It automatically identifies deal risks, successful talk patterns, and competitor mentions across your pipeline."

This will retrieve for queries about:

  • Revenue intelligence platforms
  • Sales call recording tools
  • Deal risk analysis
  • Conversation analytics

Key Takeaway

Context assembly is zero-sum.

Every token in the window is a slot. Your content competes for those slots against everything else the system could retrieve.

If you're not retrieved, you're not considered. Retrievability is the first gate to AI visibility.

YR
About the author
Youssef El Ramy

Founder of VisibilityLens. Analyzes how AI models interpret and cite website content, publishing independent research on companies like Gong, Loom, and Basecamp.

See This in Action

This is one of five dimensions in the AI Visibility framework. See how it plays out in real analyses:

Want Your Site Analyzed?

Get a complete AI visibility analysis with actionable recommendations.

Request Your Analysis